ARENA

• Eriksen E. O., Fossum J. E., Kumm M., Menéndez A. J.: The European Constitution: the Rubicon Crossed?, „ARENA Report”, 2005, no. 3.
• Fossum J. E.: Contemporary European constitution-making: constrained or reflexive?, „ARENA Working Paper”, 2005, nr 4.
• Fossum J. E.: Still a Union of deep diversity? The Convention and the Constitution for Europe, „ARENA Working Paper”, 2003, nr 21.
• Fossum J. E., Menéndez A. J. : The Constitution’s Gift? A deliberative democratic analysis of constitution-making in the European Union, „ARENA Working Paper”, 2005, nr 13.
• Fossum J. E, Menéndez A. J.: Democratic constitution-making - reflections on the European experiment, „ARENA Working Paper”, 2005, nr 18.
• Fossum J.E., Trenz H.J.: The EU’s fledgling society: From deafening silence to critical voice in European constitution making, „ARENA Working Paper”, 2005, nr 19.
• Maurer A.: The Convention and the national parliamentary dimension, „ARENA Working Paper”, 2005, nr 1.
• Menéndez A. J.: Neither Constitution, Nor Treaty. A deliberative-democratic analysis of the Constitutional Treaty of the European Union, „ARENA Working Paper”, 2005, nr  8.
• Menéndez A. J.: Three conceptions of the European Constitution, „ARENA Working Paper”, 2003, nr 12.
• Rittberger B., Schimmelfennig F.: Building Europe’s Constitution. The parliamentarization and institutionalization of human rights, „ARENA Working Paper”, 2006, nr 07.

The Centre for European Policy Studies

• Baldwin R., Widgren M: Beyond Surprise Solutions for the Voting System of the EU’s Council of Ministers, CEPS Commentary, May 2003.
• Baldwin R., Widgren M: Council Voting in the Constitutional Treaty: Devil in the Details, „CEPS Policy Brief”, July 2004, No. 53.
• Baldwin R., Widgren M.: Decision-Making and the Constitutional Treaty: Will the IGC discard Giscard?, „CEPS Policy Brief”, August 2003, No. 37.
• Baldwin R., Widgren M.: The Draft Constitutional Treaty’s Voting Reform Dilemma, „CEPS Policy Briefs”, November 2003, No. 44.
• Baldwin R., Widgren M.: The Problem with the Irish voting proposal (CIG 82/04), CEPS Commentary, June 2004.
• Baldwin R., Widgren M: Winners and Losers under Various Dual-Majority Voting Rules for the EU’s Council of Ministers, „CEPS Policy Brief”, April 2004, No. 50.
• de Búrca G., Zeitlin J.: Constitutionalising the Open Method of Coordination - What Should the Convention Propose?, „CEPS Policy Brief”, March 2003, No. 31.
• Clerck-Sachsse J.: The paradox of European Democracy- reflections on a “Plan D” for the EU, CEPS Commentary, 1 July 2005.
• Closa C.: Ratifying the EU Constitution: Referendums and their Implications, „U.S.-Europe Analysis Series”, November 2004.
• Crum B.: EU Referendum Tests the Dutch Political Establishment, „CEPS Articles”, 10 May 2005.
• Crum B.: Momentum Lost: The IGC in Brussels 12–13 December 2003, CEPS Commentary, December 2003.
• Crum B., Coussens W.: Towards Effective and Accountable Leadership of the Union - Options and Guidelines for Reform, „EPIN Working Paper”, January 2003, No. 3.
• Grant Ch., Gedmin J., Bordachev T.: Strategic Implications of the EU Crisis, „ESF Working Papers”, 2006, No. 21.
• Gros D.: The Stability Pact is dead! Long live the Treaty?, CEPS Commentary, December 2003.
• Guild, E., Carrera, S.: No Constitutional Treaty? Implications for the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, „CEPS Working Document”, October 2005, no. 231.
• Hughes K.: The Battle for Power in Europe - Will the Convention Get it Right?, „EPIN Working Paper”, February 2003, No. 4.
• Hughes K.: The future of Europe convention - Travelling hopefully?, „EPIN Working Paper”, June 2002, No. 1.
• Hughes K.: Summit Collapse: Ongoing Crisis for the Enlarged EU, CEPS Commentary, December 2003.
• Hughes K.: Will the Summit Agree the Constitutional Treaty?, CEPS Commentary, December 2003.
• Kirsch W.: What is a Fair Distribution of Power in the Council of Ministers of the EU?, CEPS Commentary, June 2004.
• Král D., Brinar I., Almer J.: The Position of Small Countries towards Institutional Reform: From tyranny of the small to directoire of the big?, „EPIN Working Paper”, June 2003, No. 6.
• Kurpas S.: What Could be Saved from the European Constitution if Ratification Fails? The Problems with a ‘Plan B’, „CEPS Policy Brief”, May 2005, No. 70.
• Kurpas S.: When the European Constitution ‘Went National’ - A Plea for a European Public Sphere, „CEPS Articles”, 4 May 2005.
• Kurpas S., Crum B.: Counting the Constitutional Blessings, CEPS Commentary, June 2004.
• Kurpas S., Incerti M., Schönlau J.: What Prospects for the European Constitutional Treaty? – Monitoring the Ratification Debates, „EPIN Working Paper”, January 2005, No. 12.
• Kurpas S., Incerti M., Schönlau J., Clerck-Sachsse J.: Update on the Ratification Debates: What Prospects for the European Constitutional Treaty? Results of and EPIN Survey of National Experts, „EPIN Working Paper”, May 2005, No. 13.
• Kurpas S., Meyer Ch., Gialoglou K.: After the EU Elections, Before the Constitution Referenda, Can the EU Communicate Better?, „CEPS Policy Brief”, July 2004, No. 55.
• Kurpas S., Schönlau J.: Deadlock avoided, but sense of mission lost? The Enlarged EU and its Uncertain Constitution, „CEPS Policy Briefs”, February 2006, No. 92.
• Meyer Ch.: A single referendum across Europe, „CEPS Articles”, 5 May 2005.
• Paterson I: Voting Power Derives from the Poll Distribution: Shedding Light on Contentious Issues of Weighted Votes and the Constitutional Treaty, „ENEPRI Working Papers”, 2007, No. 50.
• Philippart E.: The Convention on the Future of the EU, „CEPS Policy Brief”, February 2002, No. 11.
• Philippart E.: Optimizing the Mechanism for 'Enhanced Cooperation' within the EU: Recommendations for the Constitutional Treaty, „CEPS Policy Brief”, May 2003, No. 33.
• Schaik L. van., Egenhofer Ch.: Improving the Climate: Will the new Constitution strengthen EU performance in international climate negotiations?, „CEPS Policy Brief”, February 2005, No.63.
• Schaik L. van, Egenhofer C.: Reform of the EU Institutions: Implications for the EU’s Performance in Climate Negotiations, „CEPS Policy Brief”, September 2003, No. 40.
• Townsend A.: Can the EU Deliver the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice?, „EPIN Working Paper”, September 2003, No. 9.

Centre for European Reform

• After the Brussels summit: what next for the EU?, „CER Policy Brief”, 17 December 2003.
• Barysch K.: The Austrian EU presidency and the future of the constitutional treaty, „CER Briefing Note”, 24 January 2006.
• Barysch K., Keohane D.: Why the European Convention and EU Economic Reform may be the Key to a Yes Vote on the Euro, „New Economy”, June 2003, Volume 10, Issue 2.
• Bérès P.: More power for the Parliament, „CER Bulletin”, April/May 2003, issue 29.
• Bildt C.: Europe must keep its 'soft power', „Financial Times”, 1 June 2005.
• Brady H.: Europe - Did we make the right choice?, „The Yorkshire Post”, 3 June 2005.
• Butler N., A clean break for Europe, „CER Bulletin”, October 2003, issue 32.
• The CER guide to the Brussels summit, „CER Briefing Note”, December 2003.
• The CER guide to the draft EU constitution, „CER Policy Brief”, October 2003.
• The CER guide to the EU's constitutional treaty, „CER Policy Brief”, July 2004.
• Delors J.: Europe needs an avant-garde, but..., „CER Bulletin”, October/November 2000, issue 14.
• Everts S., Grant C.: Should Britain hold a referendum on the EU constitution?, „CER Bulletin”, December/January 2004, issue 33.
• Everts S., Keohane D.: A new era in European democracy, „CER Bulletin”, October/November 2004, issue 38.
• Everts S., Keohane D.: An unconventional bargain, „CER Bulletin”, June/July 2003, issue 30.
• Everts S., Keohane D.: The European Convention and EU Foreign Policy: Learning from Failure, „Survival”, Autumn 2003, Vol. 45, No. 3, s. 167-186.
• Grabbe H.: The EU will soon grow out of its new clothes, „International Herald Tribune”, 13 June 2003.
• Grabbe H.: The siren song of a two-speed Europe, „Financial Times”, 16 December 2003.
• Grabbe H.: A union of shifting coalitions, „Warsaw Business Journal”, 2 June 2003.
• Grant C.: Did the French do us a favour? [ NO ] The continent's usefulness is its unity, „Los Angeles Times”, 5 June 2005.
• Grant C.: Europe beyond the referendums, „CER Bulletin”, June/July 2005, issue 42.
• Grant C.: Exclusive! The British press is different, „The Economist - The World in 2005”.
• Grant C.: If Britain votes NO..., „CER Bulletin”, June/July 2004, issue 36.
• Grant C.: The Liberal Case for the Constitution, „Wall Street Journal”, 30 October 2003.
• Grant C.: Si le France rejette le traité, il ne se passera rien,  „Liberation”, 22 May 2005.
• Grant C.: Staring into the abyss, „E!Sharp”, July/August 2005.
• Grant C.: There is life beyond a European constitution,  „Financial Times”, 23 May 2005.
• Grant C.: Tony Blair invite les Européens à réfléchir au non français, „Le Monde”, 31 May 2005.
• Grant C.: Variable geometry, „Prospect Magazine”, July 2005.
• Grant C.: What if the British vote No?, „Foreign Affairs”, May/June 2005.
• Grant C., Keohane D.: A primer on the EU’s Constitution, „The Wall Street Journal”, 23 May 2003.
• Keohane D.: Don't forget the Dutch referendum, „CER Briefing Note”, 19 May 2005.
• Keohane D.: A guide to the referenda on the EU Constitutional treaty, „CER Briefing Note”, October 2004.
• Keohane D.: A French lesson for Europe? A guide to the referenda on the EU constitutional treaty, „CER Briefing Note”, April 2005.
• Keohane D.: Making progress in space - the European Union's final frontier, „European Voice”, June 2003.
• Keohane D.: Referendum season in Europe: A guide to the referenda on the EU constitutional treaty, „CER Briefing Note”, 18 April 2005.
• Leonard M.: Democracy in Europe: How the EU can survive in an age of referendums, „CER essays”, March 2006.
• Leonard M.: Europe will survive a French Non, „Foreign Policy”, 20 April 2005.
• Murray A.: Three cheers for EU democracy, „CER Bulletin”, December 2004 /January 2005, issue 39.
• Murray A.: When the dust settles, „CER Bulletin”, June/July 2005, issue 42.
• Roma M.: Who's afraid of the charter of rights?, „CER Bulletin”, June/July 2004, nr 36.
• Straw J.: A Constitution for our kind of Europe, 7 December 2004.
• Townsend A.: Can the EU achieve an area of freedom, security and justice?, „CER Opinion”, October 2003.
• Wanlin A.: The EU constitutional treaty: the final deal, briefing note, „CER Briefing Note”, 24 June 2004.
• Wanlin A.: The EU constitutional treaty: the state of play ahead of the summit, „CER Briefing Note”, 14 June 2004.
• Wanlin A.: European democracy: Where now?, „Open Democracy”, 2 June 2005.
• Wanlin A.: What would be the implications of a 'No' vote for the European Constitution?, „Integrace”, 1 November 2004.
• What happens if France votes No?, „CER Briefing Note”, 13 May 2005.

Centrum Europejskie Natolin

• Grimm D.: Przez konstytucję do integracji, „Nowa Europa”, 2005, nr 1, s. 17-39.
• Terpan F.: Francuska debata przed referendum, „Nowa Europa”, 2005, nr 1, s. 198-209.
• Trzaskowski R.: Traktat Konstytucyjny - możliwe scenariusze rozwoju sytuacji, „Analizy Centrum Europejskiego Natolin”, 2005.
• Wessels W.: The Constitutional Treaty within a Fusion Trend, „Forum natolińskie”, 2005, nr 1.
• Żukowski T.: How do we treat the Eurotreaty? Opinion polls concerning attitudes of Poles towards the Euroconstitution, „Analizy Natolińskie”, 2007, nr 1.

Centrum Stosunków Międzynarodowych

• Bachmann K.: Co zmienia Traktat Konstytucyjny UE, „Raporty i Analizy”, 2005, nr 2.
• Bachmann K.: Unia Europejska dwóch prędkości jest niemożliwa, „Raporty i Analizy”, 2004, nr 13.
• Bachmann K: Konwent Europejski. O czym dyskutuje Konwent UE, a o czym powinien i co należy zrobić, aby go do tego zmusić?, „Raporty i Analizy”, 2003, nr 1.
• Czaputowicz J.: Polityka zagraniczna i dyplomacja Unii Europejskiej a Traktat Konstytucyjny, „Raporty i Analizy”, 2005, nr 4.
• Kranz J.: Między Niceą a Brukselą albo życie po śmierci, „Raporty i Analizy”, 2004, nr 2.
• Nowak B.: Europejski Konwent. Sukces czy porażka?, „Raporty i Analizy”, 2003, nr 4.
• Nowak B.: Unia Europejska po szczycie w Brukseli, „Raporty i Analizy”, 2004, nr 1.
• Nowak B., Rowiński R.: Unia Europejska po rozszerzeniu. Na pierwszym zakręcie, „Raporty i Analizy”, 2004, nr 8.
• Pytanie o Boga, wiarę i religię w Europejskiej Konstytucji (red. B. Nowak), „Materiały z seminariów i konferencji”, 2003.
• Unijna polityka zagraniczna i konstytucja (Polityka zagraniczna i bezpieczeństwa UE w świetle Traktatu Konstytucyjnego) (red. M. Wągrowska), „Materiały z seminariów i konferencji”, styczeń 2005.

CIDEL

• Closa C.: Ratifying the EU Constitution: Referendums and their implications, „U.S.-Europe Analysis Series”, The Brookings Institution, November 2004.

College of Europe

• From Union to Constitution? Debating the future of the EU, „Collegium”, No. 23, Spring 2002.
• Hanf D.: Réformes institutionnelles sans révision du traité?, „Research Papers in Law”, 2006, no. 3 (discussion paper).
• Mahncke D.: From Structure to Substance: Has the Constitutional Treaty improved the Chances for a Common Foreign and Security Policy?, „Research Papers in Law”, 2005, nr 6.
• Reh C., Scholl B.: The Convention on the Future of Europe: Extended Working Group or Constitutional Assembly?, „Research Papers in Law”, 2005, nr 4.

demosEUROPA - Centrum Strategii Europejskiej

• Świeboda P.: Jak przywrócić dynamikę Unii Europejskiej? W poszukiwaniu odpowiedzi na kryzys konstytucyjny w UE, „demosEUROPA- Centrum Strategii Europejskiej ”, Warszawa 2007.

Europainstitut

• Hable A.: The European Constitution: Changes in the Reform of Competences with a Particular Focus on the External Dimension, „EI Working Paper”, March 2005, Nr. 67.
• Hable A.: Handlungsformen und Kompetenzen in der Europäischen Verfassungsdebatte, „IEF Working Paper”, September 2003, Nr.  53.

European Institute of Public Administration

• Best E.: The EU Institutions between Enlargement and the Constitution, „Eipascope”, 2004, No. 3.
• Best E.: In Search of the Lost Constitution: The EU between Direct Democracy and the Permissive Consensus, „Eipascope”, 2005, No. 2.
• Best E.: What is Really at Stake in the Debate over Votes?, „Eipascope”, 2004, No. 1.
• Beyer M.: Making Abbé Sieyès and Jürgen Habermas Meet: Constitution-Making in the Supranational Setting, „Working Paper”, 2005, No. W/03.
• Christiansen T., Gray M.: The European Commission and Treaty Reform, „Eipascope”, 2003, No. 3.
• Duke S.: The Constitutional Debacle and External Relations,  „Eipascope”, 2005, No. 2.
• Duke S.: The Convention, the draft Constitution and External Relations: Effects and Implications for the EU and its international role, „Working Paper”, 2003, No. W/2.
• Flynn B.: Reformed subsidiarity in the Constitution for Europe: Can it deliver on expectations?, „Working Paper”, 2005, No. W/07.
• Forbes A.: What does business think of the EUConstitution?, „Working Paper”, 2005, No. W/06.
• Fossum J. E., Menéndez A. J.: The Draft Constitutional Treaty: Between Problem-Solving Treaty and Rights-Based Constitution, „Working Paper”, 2005, No. W/04.
• Mazzucelli C.: The Road Not Taken: Why the Dutch Referendum on the Constitutional Treaty ‘Made All The Difference’ for Europe, „Working Paper”, 2005, No. W/08.
• Schütze R.: Sharpening the separation of powers through a hierarchy of norms? Reflections on the draft Constitutional Treaty’s regime for legislative and executive law-making, „Working Paper”, 2005, No. W/01.
• Vos H.: National/regional parliaments and EU decision-making under the new Constitutional Treaty, „Working Paper”, 2005, No. W/02.

European Integration online Papers - European Community Studies Association Austria

• Abromeit H., Wolf S.: Will the Constitutional Treaty Contribute to the Legitimacy of the European Union?, „European Integration online Papers”, 2005, No.11.
• Hofmann H.: A Critical Analysis of the new Typology of Acts in the Draft Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, „European Integration online Papers”, 2003, No. 9.
• Plechanovová B.: Draft constitution and the decision-making rule for the Council of Ministers of the EU – Looking for alternative solution, „European Integration online Papers”, 2004, No. 12.
• Raunio T.: Much Ado About Nothing? National Legislatures in the EU Constitutional Treaty, „European Integration online Papers”, 2005, No.9.
• Schneider H.: The Constitution Debate, „European Integration online Papers”, 2003, No. 4.

European Policy Centre

• After the IGC - a two speed Europe or a no speed Europe?, 12.01.2004
• Crossick S.: Constitutional Declaration, 14.11.2003.
• Crossick S., Allio L.: The Intergovernmental Conference and Business. „EPC Issue Paper”, 14.10.2003, No. 6.
• de Búrca G.: Fundamental Rights and the draft Constitutional Treaty, „Challenge Europe”, 2003, issue 9.
• Dehousse F., Coussens W., Grevi G.: Integrating Europe: Multiple Speeds - One Direction?, „EPC Working Paper”, 8.04.2004, No. 9.
• The Draft Constitutional Treaty - An Assessment, „EPC Issue Paper”, 03.07.2003, No. 5.
• Durand G.: Of Diplomats and numbers, 12.11.2003.
• Durand G.: 2004 - The Year of Transitions, 2.12.2003.
• Ertl I.: The Convention - a step backwards for a multicultural Europe? „Challenge Europe”, 2003, issue 10.
• Felsenthal D. S., Machover M.: Population and Votes in the Council of Ministers: Squaring the Circle, „EPC Issue Paper”, 15.01.2004, No. 10.
• Gerhard O.: Les Droits Fondamentaux dans le Futur Traité Constitutionnel, 22.06.2004.
• Grevi G.: The Constitutional Treaty: Democracy, Power and the Future - Views from Jens-Peter Bonde, Lamberto Dini, Peter Hain and Dimitrij Rupel, „Challenge Europe”, 2003, issue 10.
• Grevi G.: Light and Shade of a quasi-Constitution, „EPC Issue Paper”, 23.06.2004, No. 14.
• Grevi G.: New Maps for a new debate on Europe, 5.01.2004.
• Grevi G.: A new Minister in town? Risks and opportunities in the IGC debate, 14.11.2003.
• Grevi G., Halligan A.: Who wants what in the IGC?, 4.12.2003.
• Grevi G., Nestor J., Durand G.: Integration and Enlargement, „EPC Working Paper”, 15.10.2003, No. 6.
• Hagemann S., Missiroli A.: Debating the Constitution: between realism and revival, „Policy brief”, May 2007.
• Heusgen C., Edthofer J.: The Council at 30-plus: Institutional Repercussions, „Challenge Europe”, 2004, issue 12.
• On the slow road to recovery, destination unknown, „EPC Post-Summit Analyses”, 19.06.2006.
• Palmer J.: After the failure of the Constitutional Treaty negotiations - New directions for European integration?, 14.12.2003.
• Palmer J.: The Constitutional Treaty – opening the way to a „core” Europe?, 20.06.2004.
• Pamler J., Grevi G., Durand G.: Ratify the Constitution - Strengthen EU Democracy, „EPC Issue Paper”, 27.04.2005, no. 30.
• Rossi L. S.: What if the Constitutional Treaty is not ratified?, 30.06.2004.
• Schoutheete de Tervarent P.: The historical significance of the Draft Constitution, „Challenge Europe”, 2003, issue 10.
• What will be lost if the EU Constitutional Treaty is not adopted, 12.05.2005.

European Policy Institutes Network

• Almer J., Langdal F.: Swedish position in the IGC, December 2003.
• Bergström C. F., Rotkirch M.: Simply Simplification? - The Proposal for a Hierarchy of Legal Acts, SIEPS, June 2003, Preliminary report No. 8.
• Bobinski K.: Nice or bust. The Polish position after the Brussels Summit, December 2003.
• Brown A.: Country Report: Ireland, „EPIN Ratification Monitor”, February 2005.
• Brown T.: EPIN Ratification Monitor - Country Report: Ireland, Irish Institute for European Affairs, Dublin, February 2005.
• Brown T.: The Debate on the Future of the European Union in Ireland, Institute of European Affairs, 4 March 2003.
• Brown T.: The Future of Europe Convention: into the last months, Institute of European Affairs, 15 March 2003.
• Bungs D.: The Debate in Latvia on the Future of Europe. Latvian Institute of International Affairs, December 2002.
• Cameron F.: The EU's Failure - Everyone Must Share the Blame, December 2003.
• Cameron F., Primatarova A.: Enlargement, CFSP and the Convention - The Role of the Accession States. „EPIN Working Paper”, June 2003, No. 5.
• Crum B.: Country Report: The Netherlands, „EPIN Ratification Monitor”, May 2005.
• Crum B.: Staging European Union Democracy, „EPIN Working Paper”, December 2003, No.10.
• Crum B.: Suspend the IGC to consult the citizens, Centre for European Policy Studies, 27 February 2004.
• Debate on the Future of Europe: Some views from Cyprus, Research and Development Centre Intercollege, January 2003.
• The Debate on the Future of the European Union in the Republic of Lithuania, European Integration Studies Centre of Lithuania, December 2002.
• Duff A.N.: What happened in the Brussels European Council?, December 2003.
• For the Constitution of the European Union. Convergences, Divergences, Possible Paths (and a Few Proposals), Astrid, February 2003.
• Grevi G., Durand G.: Integration and Enlargement, The European Policy Centre, Working Paper, 15 October 2003, No. 6.
• Grevi G.: Time for a Government of the Union, The European Policy Centre, Working Paper, 10 April 2003.
• Gropas R.: The National Debate on the Future of Europe in Greece, EPIN Briefing, January 2003.
• Guérot U.: Germany and the Convention on Europe’s Constitution: On the way to federalism?, DGAP, 15 October 2002.
• Guérot U., Hughes K., Lefebvre M., Egenhoff T.: France, Germany and the UK in the Convention - common interests or pulling in different directions?, „EPIN Working Paper”, July 2003, No. 7.
• Höreth M., Iral H.: The Future of Europe Debate in Germany (2): Searching for a coherent Reform Strategy, Centre for European Integration Studies (ZEI), December 2002.
• Hughes K.: A French 'no': looming crisis for Europe?, May 2005.
• Hughes K.: The British debate on the EU Constitution: Can the Referendum be Won?, January 2005.
• Hughes K.: A Dynamic and Democratic EU or Muddling Through Again? Assessing the EU's Draft Constitution, „EPIN Working Paper”, July 2003, No. 8.
• Intergovernmental Conference 2003 – Romanian delegation position on the Legislative Function, the Formation of the Council and the Presidency of the Council of Ministers, December 2003.
• Iral H.: The Position of the German Government in the Intergovernmental Conference, November 2003.
• Keohane D.: The UK and the Convention - National Debate on the Future of Europe, EPIN Briefing Note, December 2002.
• Král D.: Country Report: Czech Republic, „EPIN Ratification Monitor”, March 2005.
• Král D.: The Czech Debate on the Proposal of the Constitutional Treaty, Europeum, Institute for European Policy, December 2002.
• Král D.: The Czech ratification of the Constitutional Treaty – victim of the government crisis?, Europeum, March 2005.
• Král D.: The Czech reaction to the IGC failure - disillusion or indifference , Europeum, Institute for European Policy, December 2003.
• Král D., Brinar I., Almer J.: Position of small countries towards institutional reform – from tyranny of the Small to directoire of the Big?, EPIN joint working paper, September 2003.
• Kühnhardt L.: Deutscher Bundestag, Ausschuß für die Angelegenheiten der Europäischen Union, Öffentliche Anhörung: Stand der Arbeit des EU-Verfassungskonvents, ZEI, 21 May 2003.
• Kurpas S.: The Convention on the Future of Europe - Complex but not Unknown, CEPS, September 2003.
• Kurpas S.: When the European Constitution ‘Went National’- A Plea for a European Public Sphere, „CEPS Studies”, May 2005.
• Kurpas S., Incerti M., Schönlau J., De Clerk-Sachsse J.: Update on the Ratification Debates, „EPIN Working Paper”, May 2005, No. 13.
• Kurpas S., Incerti M., Schönlau J.: What prospects for the European Constitutional Treaty? Monitoring the ratification debates, „EPIN Working Paper”, 12 January 2005, No. 12.
• Langdal F.: Country Report: Sweden, „EPIN Ratification Monitor”, May 2005.
• Langdal F., Rotkirch M.: The National Debate on the Future of Europe in Sweden, SIEPS - Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, 15 January 2003.
• Larhant M.: Constitutional referendum in France: a mid-term assessment, Notre Europe, February 2005.
• Larhant M.: Country Report: France, „EPIN Ratification Monitor”, February 2005.
• Lefebvre M.: France and the Convention : between national interests and a european vision, IFRI, February 2003.
• Malta's position on the forthcoming EU Intergovernmental Conference, which will focus on the draft EU constitution, was presented by Maltese Prime Minister Eddie Fenech Adami, in a letter sent on 8th September 2003, to Italian Prime Minister and current EU President Sig. Silvio Berlusconi, December 2003.
• National Debates on the Future of Europe, European Institute of Romania, January 2003.
• National Debate on Future of Europe, Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation, January 2003.
• Pelkmans J., Limonard B.: The Netherlands and the Future of Europe Convention, EPIN Briefing Note, March 2003.
• Powell C.: The Spanish debate on the future of the European Union, Real Instituto Elcano de Estudios Internacionales y Estratégicos, December 2002.
• Primatarova A.: The Bulgarian debate on the future of Europe, Centre for Liberal Strategies, March 2003.
• Raik K.: The Future of Europe Debate in Finland: Cautiously in the Core, The Finnish Institute of International Affairs, December 2002.
• Schacke I.T., Mariegaard L.: The Danish national debate on the Convention, Institute of International Studies (IIS) – former DUPI, 16 January 2003.
• Siapkidou E.: Positions of the Greek Government on the Intergovernmental Conference for the EU Constitution, December 2003.
• Sørensen C.: Danish positions – ICG 2003, December 2003.
• Sørensen C., Vestergaard A. M.: A Perilous Democratic Exercise: The Referendum on the Constitutional Treaty in Denmark, EPIN Constitutional Ratification Monitor, Danish Institute for International Studies, February 2005.
• Sørensen C., Vestergaard A. M.: Country Report: Denmark, „EPIN Ratification Monitor”, March 2005.
• Summary of the official position of the Government of the Slovak Republic (SR) on the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, December 2003.
• Tosato G., Greco E.: The EU Constitutional Treaty: How to Deal with the Ratification Bottleneck, “The International Spectator”, 2004, No. 4.
• Xuereb P.G.: The European Council failed for lack of Solidarity, December 2003.

European University Institute, The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies

• de Búrca G., de Witte B.: The Delimitation of Powers between the EU and Its Member States, „Policy Papers: Series on Constitutional Reform of the EU”, 2001, No. 3.
• de Witte B.: Ten Reflections on the Constitutional Treaty for Europe, April 2003.
• Habermass J.: So, Why Does Europe Need a Constitution? / Warum braucht Europa eine Verfassung?, „Policy Papers: Series on Constitutional Reform of the EU”, 2001, No. 2.
• Landfried Ch.: Difference as a Potential for European Constitution-Making, „EUI Working Papers”, 2005, No. 4.
• León M., Mateo Diaz M., Millns S.: (En)gendering the Convention: Women and the Future of the European Union, „Policy Papers”, 2003, No. 1.
• Nieto Garrido E.: The Strengthening of the Commission Competences by the Constitutional Treaty and the Principle of Balance of Power, „EUI Working Papers”,  2005, No. 3.
• Waddington L.: The Expanding Role of the Equality Principle in European Union Law, „Policy Papers: Series on Constitutional Reform of the EU”, 2003, No. 4.

EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy

• Khol R.: Possible implications of the Constitutional Treaty for the EU Foreign and Security Policy - A Czech Perspective,  Paper for EUROPEUM workshop, 28 November 2003.
• Král D.: And what if they do not buy it? Reflections on how to win the constitutional referenda and consequences of (non) ratification, EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy, May 2004.
• Král D.: The Constitution is Dead. Long live the Treaty of Nice?, 27 October 2005.
• Král D.: The Czech ratification of the Constitutional Treaty – victim of the Government crisis?, „EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy”, Prague, March 2005.
• Král D.: The Czech reaction to the IGC failure - disillusion or indifference?, „Komentáře”, 19.12.2003.
• Král D.: Intergovernmental Conference - heading for a bad deal, or no deal at all?, „Komentáře”, 21.11.2003.
• Kral D.: Pitfalls of the Constitutional Treaty Ratification in the Czech Republic, „Policy brief”, March 2005.
• Král D.: Profile of the Visegrád Countries in the Future of Europe Debate, EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy, September 2003.
• Kratochvíl P.: Qualified Majority Voting and the Interests of the Czech Republic, Institute of International Relations, September 2003.
• Rovná L., Wessels W.: EU Constitutionalisation – From the Convention to the Constitutional Treaty 2002-2005, EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy, 2006.

The Federal Trust

• Beger N.: Participatory Democracy: Organised Civil Society and the 'New' Dialogue, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 9.
• Bellamy R., Schönlau J.: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: The Need for constitutional compromise and the drafting of the EU Constitution, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2003, No. 33.
• Bengtson C.: National Parliaments in European decision-making: A real prospect or wishful thinking?, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2003, No. 29.
• Brown T.: Achieving balance: Institutions and member States, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 1.
• Brown T.: Conventional Wisdom – what have we learned from the Convention experience?, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 11.
• Brown T.: National Parliaments in the Convention on the Future of Europe, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2003, No. 31.
• Catá Backer L.: Restraining Power from Below: The European Constitution’s Text and the Effectiveness of Protection of Member State Power within the EU Framework, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 15.
• Covell M.: European Union Constitution-making in Comparative Perspective, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2003, No. 30.
• Donnelly B.: Constitution or Constitutional Treaty?, „Federal Trust Policy Commentary”, February 2005.
• Donnelly B.: Whither the Council?, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2003, No. 37.
• Donnelly B., Hoffmann L.: All change or no change? Convention, constitution and national sovereignty, „European Policy Briefs”, November 2003, No. 1.
• Dougan M.: The Convention's Draft Constitutional Treaty: A 'Tidying-Up Exercise' That Needs Some Tidying-Up Of Its Own, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2003, no. 27.
• Edward D.: Thinking about Constitutions, „European Essay”, No. 34, February 2005.
• Eleftheriadis P.: Constitution or Treaty?, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 12.
• European Newsletter (poprzednio EU Constitution Newsletter)
• Føllesdal A.: Achieving Stability? Forms and Arenas of Institutional and National Balances in the Draft Constitutional Treaty, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 5.
• Gavin B.: From the Convention to the IGC: Visioning the Future of Europe, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2003, No. 36.
• Gliga S.: Constitution and community. Social Underpinnings of a Legal Order, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 18.
• Grevi G.: Light and shade of a quasi-Constitution: An assessment, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 8.
• Hoffmann L.: Constitutionalism and Federalism in the 'Future of Europe' Debate: The German Dimension, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 3.
• Hurrelmann A.: European Constitutionalism and Social Integration, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 13.
• Jeffery Ch.: Regions and the European Union: Letting them in, and leaving them alone, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 14.
• Leal Arcas R.: Doha Negotations on services trade: Consequences of the Nice Treaty reform and the Constitutional Treaty, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 22.
• Magnette P.: Why and how arguing in a Constitutional Convention?, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2003, No. 34.
• Marco Colino S.: Towards greater flexibility or deadlock?, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 24.
• Melchior J.: Assessing the Constitutional Treaty: The Quest for Democracy, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 20.
• Monks J.: Thoughts on Europe's Future, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 2.
• Neuhold Ch., Versluis E.: The Constitutional Treaty: Tackling the 'Democratic Challenge', „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 25.
• Nicolaïdis K.: The New Constitution as European Demoi-cracy?, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2003, No. 38.
• Norman P.: From the Convention to the IGC (Institutions), „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2003, No. 28.
• Pereira Menaut A. C.: Three critiques of the European Constitution, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 23.
• Phinnemore D.: The European Convention, the 2003 IGC and the Future of Enlargement, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 4.
• Raunio T.: Towards tighter scrutiny? National Legislatures in the EU Constitution, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 16.
• Smerdel B.: The Convention on the Future of Europe and the Process of Constitutional Choice, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2003, No. 35.
• Tridimas T.: The European Court of Justice and the Draft Constitution: A Supreme Court for the Union?, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 5.
• Vergés Bausili A.: The Constitutional Convention and Ireland, „Online Papers on the Future of Europe”, 2003, no. 21.
• Walker N.: After the Constitutional Moment, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2003, No. 32.
• Walker N.: The EU as a constitutional project, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 19.
• White S.: European Constitution: what is new in the area of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation, „Constitutional Online Papers”, 2004, No. 7.

Fundacja "Polska w Europie"

• Barcz J.: Konstytucja dla Europy – wprowadzenie do dyskusji, „PwE”, marzec 2002, nr 39.
• Barcz J.: Wspólna Polityka Zagraniczna i Bezpieczeństwa w pracach Konwentu UE, „PwE”, 2003, nr 44.
• Bobiński K.: Wobec debaty konstytucyjnej, „PwE”, marzec 2004, nr 45.
• Hübner D., Jesień L.: The European Convention, „Studies & Analyses”, 2002 Vol. I, nr 4.
• Niżnik, J.: Jaka Unia Europejska leży w interesie Polski?, „PwE”, marzec 2004, nr 45.
• Kranz J.: Bruksela – tezy po fiasku, „PwE”, marzec 2004, nr 45.
• Żurawski P. (vel Grajewski): Nicejska równowaga, „PwE”, marzec 2004, nr 45.

Institut francais des relations internationales

• Chopin T., Lefebvre M.: Les vertus du projet Giscard, „Le Figaro”, 23 juin 2003.
• Goulard S.: Petit examen de conscience européen, „Politique étrangère”, 2004, n° 2.
• Lefebvre M.: La Constitution européenne: bilan d'un accouchement (2002-2004), „Policy Paper”, septembre 2004, n˚ 8.
• Lefebvre M.: La Constitution européenne: une avancée non négligeable, „Libération”, 9 juillet 2004.
• Lefebvre M.: L'Europe aura-t-elle sa Constitution?, „Policy Brief”, janvier 2003, n° 1.
• Lefebvre M.: La France et la Convention : entre les intérêts nationaux et une vision européenne, „Policy Brief”, février 2003.
• Schild J.: La France, l'Allemagne et la Constitution européenne: un bilan mitigé, un leadership contesté, „Note du Cerfa”, mars 2004, n° 10.
• Schwarze J.: Le projet de Constitution européenne vu d'Allemagne, „Note du Cerfa”, octobre 2003, n° 5.

Istituto Affari Internazionali

• Convention Watch. Second Issue, Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome 2003.
• Greco E.: And Yet It Moves: The European Constitutional Debate One Year Later, "Brookings Institution Center on the United States and Europe", April 2006.
• Tosato G. L., Greco E.: The EU Constitutional Treaty: How to Deal with the Ratification Bottleneck, Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome 2004.
• Tosato, G. L., Greco E.: European Constitution: How to proceed if France or The Netherlands votes "no", Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome 2005.
• Tosato G. L., Bonvicini G.: An Italian strategy for relaunching the EU Constitutional Treaty, Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome 2007.

Instytut Kościuszki

• Barcz J., Jasiński F., Młynarski T., Tarnawska K., Wajda-Lichy M., Tlałka E., Woźniakiewicz J. M.: Implikacje ewentualnego odrzucenia Traktatu Konstytucyjnego Unii Europejskiej. Ocena następstw dla Polski w perspektywie długookresowej, grudzień 2005.

Instytut Spraw Publicznych

• Barcz J.: Aspekty prawne procedury wejścia w życie Traktatu konstytucyjnego i ewentualne konsekwencje prawno-polityczne jego odrzucenia, Instytut Spraw Publicznych, 2005.
• Barcz J., Mik C., Nowak-Far A.: Review of the EU Constitutional Treaty: challenges for Poland, Institute of Public Affairs, 2003.
• Czaplicki M.: Konstytucja Unii Europejskiej - polityczne próby wyjścia z sytuacji patowej, „Analizy i Opinie”, marzec 2004, nr 21.
• Czaplicki M.: Przegląd procesu ratyfikacji Traktatu Konstytucyjnego w państwach członkowskich UE. Stan na 1 lutego 2005, Instytut Spraw Publicznych, 2005.
• Grosse T.G.: Kondycja integracji europejskiej po szczycie UE oraz referendach we Francji i Holandii, „Analizy i Opinie”, lipiec 2005, nr 39.
• Kaczyński P. M.: Kryzys w Europie jako szansa, „Analizy i Opinie”, lipiec 2005, nr 40.
• Kaczyski P. M.: Polskie dylematy wobec nowego traktatu Unii Europejskiej, „Analizy i Opinie”, czerwiec 2007, nr 76.
• Kaczyński P. M.: Traktat da nam siłę, „Analizy i Opinie”, marzec 2005, nr 33.
• Polacy o Unii Europejskiej i Traktacie Konstytucyjnym, maj 2006.
• Przyszłość Traktatu Konstytucyjnego Unii Europejskiej – strategia dla Polski.

Instytut Studiów Strategicznych

• S. Kurek: Wartości judeochrześcijańskie w preambule Traktatu Konstytucyjnego Unii Europejskiej, „Komentarze ISS”, 2004, nr 1.
• Pieńkowski M., Słomczyński W., Życzkowski K.: W poszukiwaniu optymalnego systemu głosowania w Radzie Ministrów Unii Europejskiej, „Komentarze ISS”, 2004, nr 2.
• Po co Polakom dwie konstytucje? Debata konstytucyjna z dnia 2 czerwca 2005. Zapis wypowiedzi i wniosków z debaty, „Analizy i Komentarze”.
• Podejmowanie decyzji w Radzie Unii Europejskiej. Zapis debaty, „Analizy i Komentarze”.

The Jean Monnet Program

• Altneuland: The EU Constitution in a Contextual Perspective, „Jean Monnet Working Paper”, 2004, No. 5.
• Bering Liisberg J.: The EU Constitutional Treaty and its distinction between legislative and non-legislative acts – Oranges into apples?, „Jean Monnet Working Paper”, 2006, No. 1.
• Magnette P.: Coping with constitutional incompatibilities Bargains and Rhetoric in the Convention on the Future of Europe, „Jean Monnet Working Paper”, 2003, No. 14.
• Mayer F.: The European Constitution and the Courts - Adjudicating European constitutional law in a multilevel system, „Jean Monnet Working Paper”, 2003, No. 9.
• Roeben V.: Constitutionalism of Inverse Hierarchy: the Case of the European Union, „Jean Monnet Working Paper”, 2003, No. 8.
• de Schutter O.: The Implementation of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights through the Open Method of Coordination, „Jean Monnet Working Paper”, 2004, No. 7.
• Uerpmann R.: International Law as an Element of European Constitutional Law: International Supplementary Constitutions, „Jean Monnet Working Paper”, 2003, No. 9.
• Wessel R. A.: The Constitutional Relationship between the European Union and the European Community: Consequences for the Relationship with the Member States, „Jean Monnet Working Paper”, 2003, No. 9.
• Wierne A.: Towards a Transnational Nomos - The Role of Institutions in the Process of Constitutionalization, „Jean Monnet Working Paper”, 2003, No. 9.

Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung

• Atilgan C.: Der Europäische Verfassungsvertrag: Aufgeschobene Reformagenda, „Analysen und Argumente aus der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung”, 16 Juni 2005, Nr. 22.
• Atilgan C.: Szenarien für ein Europa ohne Verfassung, „Analysen und Argumente aus der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung”, 25 Mai 2005, Nr. 19.
• Baus R.: Referendum über den Verfassungsvertrag der Europäischen Union?, „Analysen und Argumente aus der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung”, 27 November 2003, Nr. 5.
• Brok E.: Der Europäische Verfassungskonvent, „Auslandsinformationen”, 8 Januar 2003, Nr. 1.
• Einhäuser B.: Wie nutzt Europa die Reflexionsphase? Eine erste Bilanz seit dem Gipfeltreffen im Juni 2005, „Länderberichte”, 27 Oktober 2005.
• Freudenstein R.: Die bevorstehende Regierungskonferenz zur EU-Verfassung, „Analysen und Argumente aus der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung”, 1 Dezember 2003, Nr. 2.
• Funke M.: Die EU-Verfassung – Der große Wurf ins Ungewisse, „Die Politische Meinung”, 7. April 2004.
• Gorawantschy B.: Eine Nation ist gespalten. Frankreich im Vorfeld des EU-Verfassungsreferendums, „Länderberichte”, 1. April 2005.
• Kneuer M.: Was fehlt Europa?, „Die Politische Meinung”, 5. September 2005.
• Range T.: Europäische Verfassung: Neue EU-Kompetenzen für den Deutschen Bundestag, „Arbeitspapier/Dokumentation herausgegeben von der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung”, 28 Juli 2004, Nr. 136.
• Referendum über den Verfassungsvertrag der Europäischen Union?, „Analysen und Argumente aus der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung”, 27 November 2003, Nr. 5.
• Scholz R.: Eine Verfassung für Europa - Zum Verfassungskonvent der Europäischen Union, „Auslandsinformationen”, 31 August 2003, Nr. 8.
• Stehling T. B.: Blair kündigt EU-Referendum an, „Länderberichte”, 21. April 2004.
• Stehling T. B.: Reaktionen aus Großbritannien auf den Kompromiss zum Verfassungsvertrag, „Länderberichte”, 22. Juni 2004.
• Szech-Koundouros S.: Was bringt die EU-Verfassung?, „Arbeitspapier/Dokumentation herausgegeben von der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung”, 29 Juli 2004, Nr. 137.

Netherlands Institute for International Relations Clingendael

• An Assessment of the European Convention: The Political Dynamics of Constitutional Reform (Seminar report), Clingendael Institute, July 2003.
• Debating Europe’s Future: The Political Setting of the European Convention (Conference report), Clingendael Institute,  March 2003.
• Duke S.: A Foreign Minister for the EU : But where’s the Ministry?, „Discussion Papers in Diplomacy”, November 2003, No. 89.
• Michalski A., Heise M.: European Convention on the Future of Europe: An Analysis of the Official Positions of EU Member States, Future Member States, Applicant and Candidate States, „Clingendael Working Paper”, April 2003.

Notre Europe - Groupement d'études et de recherches

• Costa O., Magnette P.: Sortir l’Union de la crise constitutionnelle, „Regard d’européens”, 27 May 2007.
• Deloche-Gaudez F.: The Convention on a Charter of Fundamental Rights: a method for the future?, „Research and Policy Paper”, November 2001, No. 15.
• Di Quirico R.: Italy, Europe and the European Presidency of 2003, „Research and European Issues”, July 2003, No. 27.
• Duff A.: Plan B: How to Rescue the European Constitution, „Studies and Research”, October 2006, No. 52.
• Laffan B.: Ireland and Europe: Continuity and Change: The 2004 Presidency, „Research and European Issues”, December 2003, No. 30.
• Lamoureux F.: Draft Constitution: why a „rear guard” should be established, 28 April 2004.
• Larhant M.: Les référendums chez les autres : l’Espagne. Séminaire organisé par Notre Europe en collaboration avec le Real Instituto Elcano à la Maison de l’Europe de Paris le 31 janvier 2005, 14 février 2005.
• Menon A.: Leading from Behind: Britain and the European Constitutional Treaty, „Research and European Issues”, January 2004, No. 31.
• Monceau H.: The European Constitution and deliberation: the Example of deliberative focus groups ahead of the French Referendum of 29 May 2005, „Research and Studies”, 2005, No. 45.
• Moravcsik A.: We can learn from the Collapse of European Constitutional Project? A Response to Eight Critics, „Etudes et Recherches”, November 2006.
• Nihoul G. R. : Le Traité constitutionnel et le Sommet de juin : quelle issue ?, „Etudes et Recherches”, Juin 2007.
• Oberdorff H: La ratification et la révision du traité établissant une Constitution pour l’Europe, Etudes et Recherches n° 38, 13 avril 2005.
• Quermonne J.-L.: The Question of a European Government, „Research and European Issues", November 2002, No. 20.
• Ricard-Nihoul G.: The French "no" vote of 29 May 2005: understand, action, „Studies and Research”, 2005, No. 44.
• Ricard-Nihoul G.: Quel avenir pour le Traité Constitutionnel?, „Etudes & Recherches”, Mai 2006.
• Ricard-Nihoul G., Larhant M.: Constitutional referendum in France: the political landscape a month before the outcome, 27 avril 2005.
• Ricard-Nihoul G., Larhant M.: Le référendum chez les autres : la Grande-Bretagne. Séminaire organisé à Paris, le 26 avril 2005 en partenariat avec le CER et l’Institut Montaigne, 3 mai 2005.
• Sidjanski D. : Quelle Commission pour la Constitution européenne?, janvier 2004.
• Sidjanski D.: Referendum europeen et referendums nationaux sur la Constitution europeenne, 14.06.04.

Robert Schuman Foundation

• Lequiller P.: Europe, how to resolve the stalemate in Europe? An institutional treaty for Europe, „Notes de la Fondation Robert Schuman”, 2007, n° 39.
• Reynié, D.: 29 mai 2005, un paysage dynamité, „Analyse”, June 2005.

Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House)

• Hable A.: Visions on the reform of competences in the European Convention, 12/13 April 2003.
• Hussain N., Hudson G. M., Whitman R.: Referendums on the EU Constitutional Treaty: the state of play, February 2005.
• Phinnemore D.: The Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe: an overview, June 2004.

Royal Institute for International Relations (KIIB – IRRI)

• Dehousse F., Coussens W.: La convention sur le futur de l'Europe: un état des lieux, „Journal des Tribunaux”, 29.03.2003.
• Dehousse F., Coussens W.: The Perils of a European Constitution, September 2002.
• Dehousse F., Coussens W., Garcia J., Brule P. Van Den: The results of the Intergovernmental Conference. An Assessment in the Light of the Convention's Draft, 18 August 2004.
• de Schoutheete P.: L'Avenir du Traité Constitutionnel, 2006.
• de Schoutheete P.: The Fate of constitutional Treaty, „Europe's World”, May 2006.

School of Politics & International Studies, Queen's University, Belfast

• Bellamy R., Schoenlau J.: The Normality of Constitutional Politics: an Analysis of the Drafting of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, „Constitutionalism Web-Papers”, 2003, No. 6.
• Closa C.: Improving EU Constitutional Politics? A Preliminary Assessment of the Convention, „Constitutionalism Web-Papers”, 2003, No. 1.
• Føllesdal A.: Drafting a European Constitution - Challenges and Opportunities, „Constitutionalism Web-Papers”, 2002, No. 4.
• Pollak J.: Democracy and the Europan Constitution: Majority Voting and Small Member States, „Constitutionalism Web-Papers”, 2004, No. 4.
• Weiß W.: Eastern Enlargement and European Constitutionalisation, „Queen’s Papers on Europeanisation”, 2005, No. 1.

Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik

• Brückner J., Held J., Stengel A., Völkel C.: Der EU-Verfassungsprozeß. Bibliographie 2001-2004, „SWP Diskussionspapier“, Juni 2004.
• Comelli M.: Capacity and Actor Building, „Strategy paper”, 15.07.2003.
• Kietz D.: Der Bundestag in der Europapolitik. Bestehende Potentiale und vom Verfassungsvertrag eröffnete Möglichkeiten besser nutzen, „SWP-Aktuell”, Mai 2005, Nr. 19.
• Kietz D., Maurer A.: Integrationsmotor Estland, „SWP-Aktuell”, Februar 2006, Nr. 11.
• Lang K.O.: Das Scheitern des Brüsseler Gipfels - Reaktionen aus den Beitrittsländern, „SWP-Diskussionspapier”, Dezember 2003.
• Lang K.O., Maurer A.: Polens Gewicht und die doppelte Mehrheit: Vor dem Endspiel der Regierungskonferenz, „SWP-Aktuell”, Dezember 2003, Nr. 51.
• Maihold G.: Kurswechsel in Madrid. Die Außenpolitik Spaniens nach den Attentaten vom 11. März 2004 und vor dem Regierungswechsel, „SWP-Aktuell”, März 2004, Nr. 12.
• Maurer A.: Aufschnüren oder Dynamisieren? Chancen und Risiken der Regierungskonferenz zum EU-Verfassungsvertrag, „SWP-Aktuell”, Oktober 2003, Nr. 38.
• Maurer A.: Die nationalen Parlamente im Europäischen Verfassungsvertrag. Anforderungen für die proaktive Ausgestaltung der Parlamente, „SWP-Diskussionspapier”, Mai 2004.
• Maurer A.: In guter Verfassung?, „SWP-Zeitschriftenschau”, 2004, Nr. 2.
• Maurer A.: Nachsitzen, Sitzenbleiben oder Klassenverweis?, „SWP-Studie”, Februar 2006, Nr. 4.
• Maurer A.: Ordnung, Effizienz und Demokratie, „SWP Diskussionspapier”, Dezember 2004.
• Maurer A.: Die Ratifikationsverfahren zum EU-Verfassungsvertrag, „SWP Diskussionspapier”, September 2005.
• Maurer A.: Die Ratifikationsverfahren zum EU-Verfassungsvertrag. Wege aus der Krise II, „SWP Diskussionspapier”, April 2006.
• Maurer A.: Schließt sich der Kreis? Der Konvent, nationale Vorbehalte und die Regierungskonferenz, Teil I, „Arbeitspapier”, 30.07.2003.
• Maurer A: Schließt sich der Kreis? Der Konvent, nationale Vorbehalte und die Regierungskonferenz Teil II - Datenbasis und Detailanalyse, „Arbeitspapier”, 30.07.2003.
• Maurer A.: Die Schlußetappe der Regierungskonferenz, „SWP-Diskussionspapier”, Mai 2004.
• Maurer A.: Der Vertrag über eine Verfassung für Europa, „SWP-Diskussionspapier”, März 2005.
• Maurer A., Kietz D.: Die neuen Rechte der nationalen Parlamente, „SWP-Diskussionspapier”, März 2004.
• Maurer A., Kietz D.: Nach dem Konvent: Die neuen Kompetenzen der nationalen Parlamente bei der Kontrolle des Subsidiaritätsprinzips, „SWP-Diskussionspapier”, Juli 2003.
• Maurer A., Kietz D.: National Parliaments' New Competencies in the Monitoring of Compliance with the Principle of Subsidiarity, „SWP discussion paper”, August 2003.
• Maurer A., Schild J.: Der Konvent über die Zukunft der europäischen Union
  Synoptische Darstellung der Konventsdebatte, „SWP-Dokumentation”, 2003.
• Maurer A., Schunz S.: Auf dem Weg zum Verfassungsvertrag: Der Entwurf einer europäischen Verfassung in der Regierungskonferenz, „SWP-Diskussionspapier”, Dezember 2003.
• Maurer A., Schunz S.: Die Textur der Krise: Europas Verfassungsgebungsprozeß in der Verlängerung, „SWP Diskussionspapier”, Februar 2003.
• Maurer A., Schunz S.: Ratifikation durch Referendum? Europas Verfassung nach der Regierungskonferenz, „SWP Diskussionspapier”, November 2003.
• Maurer A., Schunz S.: Von Brüssel nach Rom II: Der Entwurf einer Europäischen Verfassung zwischen Konvent und Regierungskonferenz, „SWP Diskussionspapier”, November 2003.
• Maurer A., Schunz S.: Von Brüssel nach Rom: Der Entwurf einer Europäischen Verfassung zwischen Konvent und Regierungskonferenz, „SWP Diskussionspapier”, Oktober 2003.
• Maurer A., Schwarzer D.: Alle Karten auf den Tisch! Ansätze zur Überwindung der konstitutionellen Malaise in der EU, „SWP – Aktuell”, Juni 2006, Nr. 28.
• Maurer A., Stengel A.: Ein Referendum für Europas Verfassung?, „SWP Diskussionspapier”, Mai 2003.
• Mokre M., Pollak J., Puntscher Riekmann S., Slominski P.: The Peoples of Europe and the European Constitutional Treaty: On Legitimacy and Participation, „Strategy paper”, 14.07.2003.
• Neuhold Ch., Vanhoonacker S., Maurer A.: Reforming the EU Institutions - Challenges for the Council, „Strategy paper”, 14.07.2003.
• Schild J.: Der instabile Kompromiß, „SWP-Studie”, Oktober 2003.
• Schwarzer D.: Lessons from the Failed Constitutional Referenda, „SWP Diskussionspapier”, Juni 2005.
• Schwarzer D.: Tauziehen um die EU-Verfassung in Frankreich, „SWP-Aktuell”, November 2004.
• Smith J., Soar C.: Division of Competences in the European Union, „Strategy paper”, 14.07.2003.

Trans European Policy Studies Association

• Agostini M. V.: The Role of National Parliaments in the Future EU, „The International Spectator”, October-December 2001, Vol. 36, No. 4.
• Constitutionalism and Democratic Representation in the European Union, Austrian Academy of Sciences, April 2003.
• Donnelly B.: The New Council of Ministers - An assessment of the Convention Proposals, November 2003.
• EU-25 WATCH, December 2004, No. 1.
• Duff A.: „Constitution plus” - Renegotiating the Treaty, „Trans-European Policy Studies Association”, February 2007.
• Franck C., Pyszna-Nigge D.: New Members, IGC and the Constitutional Treaty. Positions of acceding countries from Central Europe in the debate on the EU future, October 2004.
• Göler D., Jopp M.: Die europäische Verfassungskriese und die Strategie des langen Atems, „Integration”, 2006, Nr. 2.

University Association for Contemporary European Studies

• Church C.: Home Thoughts on Laeken and After,  „UACES On-line Reflection Papers”, 2002, No. 2.
• Chyssochoou D. N. : Visions of Republicanism and the Future of Europe, „UACES On-line Reflection Papers”, 2004, No. 3.
• McCudden C.: The Future of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, „UACES On-line Reflection Papers”, 2002, No. 1.
• Picard S.: The EU Constitutional Treaty: Towards A European Citizenship For Third Country Nationals?, „Journal of Contemporary European Research”, May 2005, vol. 1, Issue 1, s. 73.
• Usherwood S.: Realists, sceptics and opponents: opposition to theEU's Constitutional Treaty, „Journal of Contemporary European Research”, November 2005, vol 1., Issue 2, s. 4-12.

Walter Hallstein-Institut für Europäisches Verfassungsrecht

• Badinter R.: Vers une Justice Européenne, „FCE”, 2005, No. 7.
• Biernat S.: The European Constitution from the perspective of the New Member States, „FCE”, 2005, No. 1.
• Di Martino A.: Schengen, Europol und der Raum der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und des Rechts in der Verfassung der EU, „WHI Paper”, 2003, Nr. 13.
• Engelhardt B.: Welthandelsorganisation: Verfassungselemente in der Regelung des Welthandels, „WHI Paper”, 2005, Nr. 7.
  Goring R. L.: Requirements for the Emerging European Constitution, „WHI Paper”, 2003, Nr. 2.
• Häberle P.: Juristische und politische Konsequenzen des doppelten Neins von Frankreich und Holland zur EU-Verfassung, „FCE”, 2005, Nr. 5.
• Hänsch K.: Der Verfassungsentwurf für die Europäische Union nach der Regierungskonferenz, „FCE”, 2004, Nr. 2.
• MacCormick N.: How to adopt a European Constitution - and how not to adopt one,  „FCE”, 2005, Nr. 8.
• Mayer F.: Angriffskrieg und europäisches Verfassungsrecht: Zu den rechtlichen Bindungen von Außenpolitik in Europa, „WHI Paper”, 2003, Nr. 16.
• Mayer F.: La Charte européenne des droits fondamentaux et la Constitution européenne, „WHI Paper”, 2003, Nr. 11.
• Mayer F.: Competences - Reloaded? The Vertical Division of Powers in the EU after the New European Constitution, „WHI Paper”, 2004, Nr. 19.
• Mayer F.: The European Constitution and the Courts: Adjudicating European constitutional law in a multilevel system, „WHI Paper”, 2003, Nr. 15.
• Mayer F.: Individualrechtsschutz im Europäischen Verfassungsrecht, „WHI Paper”, 2004, Nr. 9.
• Mayer F.: Macht und Gegenmacht in der Europäischen Verfassung, „WHI Paper”, 2003, Nr. 9.
• Mayer F.: Der Verfassungskonvent. Strukturen, Akteure und Themen, „WHI Paper”, 2003, Nr. 4.
• Mayer F.: Verfassungsstruktur und Verfassungskohärenz - Merkmale europäischen Verfassungsrechts?, „WHI Paper”, 2003, Nr. 17.
• Mayer F.: Wer soll der Hüter der europäischen Verfassung sein?, „WHI Paper”, 2004, Nr. 20.
• Pernice I.: Democratic Leadership in Europe: The European Council and the President of the Union, „WHI Paper”, 2003, Nr. 1.
• Pernice I.: Europäische Justizpolitik in der Perspektive der Verfassung für Europa, „WHI Paper”, 2005, Nr. 3.
• Pernice I.: Fondements du droit constitutionnel européen, 30 août 2002.
• Pernice I.: Nach dem Gipfel von Brüssel: Ist die "Verfassung für Europa" gescheitert?, „WHI Paper”, 2004, Nr. 2.
• Pernice I.: Die neue Verfassung der Europäischen Union - ein historischer Fortschritt zu einem europäischen Bundesstaat?, „FCE Spezial”, 2003, Nr. 1.
• Pernice I.: Verfassung der Europäischen Union: Bemerkungen zu den Artikel-Entwürfen des Präsidiums des Verfassungskonvents, „WHI Paper”, 2002, Nr. 3.
• Pernice I.: Welche Verfassung braucht Europa?, „WHI Paper”, 2002, Nr. 3.
• Pernice I.: Zur Finalität Europas, „WHI Paper”, 2005, Nr. 6.
• Pernice I.: Zur Verfassungsdiskussion in der Europäischen Union, „WHI Paper”, 2001, Nr. 2.
• Pernice I., Kanitz R.: Fundamental Rights and Multilevel Constitutionalism in Europe, „WHI Paper”, 2004, Nr. 7.
• Pernice I., Mayer F.: De la constitution composée de l'Europe, „WHI Paper”, 2001, Nr. 1.
• Pernice I., Mayer F.: La Costituzione integrata dell’Europa, „WHI Paper”, 2003, Nr. 7.
• Pernice I., Thym D.: Interviews zur Grundrechtecharta und dem Inkrafttreten des Verfassungsvertrags, „WHI Paper”, 2004, Nr. 11.
• Pithart P.: What Europe needs most. The ratification process viewed from the new center of Europe, „FCE”, 2005, Nr. 6.
• Rempe M.: Von der Völkerherrschaft zur Demokratie? Die Europäische Union nach der "Verfassung für Europa", „WHI Paper”, 2004, Nr. 14.
• Rodriguez Iglesias G. C.: Perspektiven europäischer und nationaler Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit im Lichte des Vertrags über eine Verfassung für Europa, „FCE”, 2005, Nr. 2.
• Steinberg P.: A Tentative Survey of the Innovations of the Constitution for Europe that Might Impact Upon National Constitutional Law, „WHI Paper”, 2003, Nr. 14.
• Thym D.: The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice in the Draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, „WHI Paper”, 2004, Nr. 4.
• Thym D.: The Institutional Matrix of European Foreign Policy in the Constitutional Treaty, „WHI Paper”, 2005, Nr. 5.
• Thym D.: The New Institutional Balance of European Foreign Policy in the Draft Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, „WHI Paper”, 2003, Nr. 12.
• Wendel M.: Die Auslegung der Verfassung für Europa - Interpretationsgrundsätze und die Bedeutung der Erläuterungen des Konventspräsidiums nach Art. II-112 Abs. 7 VVE, „WHI Paper”, 2005, Nr. 4.

Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung

• Der Beitrag des ZEI zur Entwicklung eines europäischen Verfassungspatriotismus, „ZEI Report”, November 2003, Nr. 15.
• Der Verfassungsentwurf des EU-Konvents: Bewertung der Strukturentscheidungen, „ZEI Discussion Paper”, 2003,  Nr. 124.
• Elvert J.: Zur gegenwärtigen Verfassung der Europäischen Union, „ZEI Discussion Paper”, 2005,  Nr. 148.
• Eschke N., Malick T.: The European Constitution and its Ratification Crisis. Constitutional Debates in the EU Member States, „ZEI Discussion Paper”, 2006,  Nr. 156.
• Iral H.: Wartesaal oder Intensivstation? Zur Lage der EU nach der gescheiterten Regierungskonferenz, „ZEI Discussion Paper”, 2004, Nr. 133.
• Kühnhardt L.: From National Identity to European Constitutionalism European Integration: The first fifty years, „ZEI Discussion Paper”, 2003, Nr. 141.
• Reconstructing Europe. Two Alternative Proposals for a European Constitution, (red. D.Prešova), „ZEI Discussion Paper”, 2007, C 171.

wróć do góry